<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Descriptive Variable Names Affect a SWF’s File Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicolasschudel.name/how-long-variable-names-affect-swf-filesizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicolasschudel.name/how-long-variable-names-affect-swf-filesizes/</link>
	<description>Balancing Design and Development in Online Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sascha/hdrs</title>
		<link>http://nicolasschudel.name/how-long-variable-names-affect-swf-filesizes/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>sascha/hdrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicolasschudel.name/?p=6#comment-156</guid>
		<description>The long variable names are really no big deal performance-wise today anymore.
The only reason that one still could argue with is that the compiler leaves the names completely intact (except for local vars) in the swf and that you can see them all bare-naked when decompiling the swf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long variable names are really no big deal performance-wise today anymore.<br />
The only reason that one still could argue with is that the compiler leaves the names completely intact (except for local vars) in the swf and that you can see them all bare-naked when decompiling the swf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
